Limitations of Legacy SSPMs

This Guide can help Security teams make informed decisions on their SaaS security. Learn:

✔️ The five ways SaaS is sprawling away from Security.
✔️ Why legacy SSPMs can't keep up.
✔️ How the Reco architecture closes the SaaS Security Gap.
✔️ Where SSPM fits into your security stack.
✔️ Six critical threats legacy SSPMs miss.

Sign up to get your copy now.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Legacy SSPM hit the scene at the dawn of the 2020s to solve one critical problem: organizations were using multiple SaaS applications, but they had no visibility into the configurations.

Early SSPMs were fairly limited, but they met the needs of the time.

Since then, SaaS adoption has proliferated. With embedded AI, it's gone into overdrive. Today, legacy SSPMs fail to keep up with ever-changing SaaS environments.

Why?

Legacy SSPMs fall short for several reasons:
1. They don't account for shadow apps.
2. They're slow to add support for new apps.
3. They alert solely based on configurations – missing identity-based context.
4. They generate TONS of alerts – but without context, many are just noise.

And these are just some of the ways legacy SSPMs are falling behind. Read this Guide to learn more.

Get your copy now.

Ready for SaaS Security
that can keep up?

Request a demo